标签：search SharePoint results vs 2010 2013 metadata

* From a document collaboration perspective, the structures of both versions are the same – so if you create a metadata architecture for documents in 2010 it should be fully upgradable to 2013.

* The most significant upgrades in document management are in the user experience – including drag and drop to upload documents and the ability to edit managed metadata in a datasheet view.

*The primary differences are in the social experiences, especially with discussion boards. The 2013 discussion board (with Community features enabled) creates and engaging “Facebook-like” activity stream, which is far more user-friendly than the same feature in SharePoint 2010. The added visual appeal is important because getting people to use the discussion board instead of commonly used “who you know” networks will take some planning and effort. If the software is engaging and familiar it will help with “stickiness.”

*The other significant improvement is search, which you will see in the examples on the next few pages.

Business Scenario SharePoint 2010 SharePoint 2013 Document Collaboration

• Support for enterprise content types and shared metadata so that attributes and structures can be maintained in one place and shared across the enterprise, vastly improving search results. • No difference in approach for organizing content so investment in defining content types and metadata is fully leveraged in 2013. • Several helpful user experience improvements in the application of metadata, including the ability to edit managed metadata in a datasheet (spreadsheet) view.

• “Drag and drop” ability to upload documents to SharePoint libraries (without having to open library in “explorer view’). Search • Comprehensive enterprise search with the ability to use Boolean operators to create search queries. For example: search for: cats AND dogs.

• Wildcard search available. For example, as search for ho* would find homes, horses, houses, etc.

• Faceted search refiners to easily narrow results based on metadata.

• Define search scopes to target to specific collections of content.

• “Best bets” can be defined to force certain results to the top of search results.

• Significant improvements in user experience.

• Visual display of contents as you hover in search results.

• Best bets now called Promoted Results.

• Search remembers what you have previously searched and clicked and displays these values as query suggestions at the top of the results page.

• Results show number of times a document has been viewed.

• Results pages allows you to page through PowerPoint presentations without leaving the search results page. • One click to “view in library.”

Reference: https://docsbay.net/sharepoint-2010-vs-sharepoint-2013-feature-comparison

sharepoint-2010-vs-sharepoint-2013-feature-comparison

标签：search,SharePoint,results,vs,2010,2013,metadata
来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/yezhishu/p/10534060.html

本站声明： 1. iCode9 技术分享网（下文简称本站）提供的所有内容，仅供技术学习、探讨和分享；
2. 关于本站的所有留言、评论、转载及引用，纯属内容发起人的个人观点，与本站观点和立场无关；
3. 关于本站的所有言论和文字，纯属内容发起人的个人观点，与本站观点和立场无关；
4. 本站文章均是网友提供，不完全保证技术分享内容的完整性、准确性、时效性、风险性和版权归属；如您发现该文章侵犯了您的权益，可联系我们第一时间进行删除；
5. 本站为非盈利性的个人网站，所有内容不会用来进行牟利，也不会利用任何形式的广告来间接获益，纯粹是为了广大技术爱好者提供技术内容和技术思想的分享性交流网站。