ICode9

精准搜索请尝试: 精确搜索
首页 > 编程语言> 文章详细

java-在Python v 3.5.2和v 2.7.12中结果不同,但是v 2.7.12是正确的吗?

2019-11-09 08:02:43  阅读:261  来源: 互联网

标签:long-integer biginteger python java


首先,我要说一下我的问题,我知道在Python 3周围,“无限长”已集成到int中,因此Python中的int有效地可以和您的RAM一样大.

我正在比较Java和Python.
以下是Python和Java程序.他们做同样的事情.

Python:

def answer(n):
    count = 0
    t = int(n)
    while (t!=1):
        t = t+1 if (t%2==1) else t/2
        count += 1
    return count

Java:

static int answer(String n){
    int count = 0;
    BigInteger t = new BigInteger(n)

    while(!t.equals(BigInteger.ONE)){
        t = ((t.remainder(new BigInteger("2"))).equals(BigInteger.ONE))
            ?t.add(new BigInteger("1"))
            :t.divide(new BigInteger("2"));
        count++;
    }
    return count;
}

然后,我编写了一个简单的bash脚本来运行java和python(版本2.7.12和3.5.2)并比较它们的输出.

#!/bin/bash
    i=$1
    a=`java    Solution    $i`
    b=`python  Solution.py $i`
    c=`python3 Solution.py $1`

    echo "INPUT: $1"
    echo ""
    echo "LANGUAGE: VERSION:  RESULT:"
    echo "--------  --------- ------"
    echo "Java      1.8.0_151   $a"
    echo "Python    2.7.12      $b"
    echo "Python3   3.5.2       $c"

这是一些示例运行. RESULT列很重要.

INPUT: 123

LANGUAGE: VERSION:  RESULT:
--------  --------- ------
Java      1.8.0_151   9
Python    2.7.12      9
Python3   3.5.2       9


INPUT: 123456789

LANGUAGE: VERSION:  RESULT:
--------  --------- ------
Java      1.8.0_151   39
Python    2.7.12      39
Python3   3.5.2       39


INPUT: 12345678998765

LANGUAGE: VERSION:  RESULT:
--------  --------- ------
Java      1.8.0_151   61
Python    2.7.12      61
Python3   3.5.2       61


INPUT: 123456789987654321

LANGUAGE: VERSION:  RESULT:
--------  --------- ------
Java      1.8.0_151   84
Python    2.7.12      84
Python3   3.5.2       82

因此,在输入变得足够大之前,它们几乎都产生相同的结果,然后对于最后一个输入,您可以看到结果是不同的.几乎每个大于此的数字都会产生不同的结果.

Python3的int和Java的BigInteger是否应该得到相同的结果?

Python v.2难道不是获得不同结果的人吗?

哪一个实际上是错误的,为什么? Java和Python3还是Python v.2.7.12?

我如何纠正任何错误才能获得正确的输出?

解决方法:

该问题实际上与Python 2中整数文字的限制无关.这只是一个红鲱鱼.您的真正问题是除法运算符/在Python 2中的行为与在Python 3中的行为不同.

PEP 238 documents this change

The current division (/) operator has an ambiguous meaning for numerical arguments: it returns the floor of the mathematical result of division if the arguments are ints or longs, but it returns a reasonable approximation of the division result if the arguments are floats or complex. This makes expressions expecting float or complex results error-prone when integers are not expected but possible as inputs.

We propose to fix this by introducing different operators for different operations: x/y to return a reasonable approximation of the mathematical result of the division (“true division”), x//y to return the floor (“floor division”). We call the current, mixed meaning of x/y “classic division”.

Because of severe backwards compatibility issues, not to mention a major flamewar on c.l.py, we propose the following transitional measures (starting with Python 2.2):

  • Classic division will remain the default in the Python 2.x series;
    true division will be standard in Python 3.0.

  • The // operator will be available to request floor division
    unambiguously.

  • The future division statement, spelled from __future__ import
    division
    , will change the / operator to mean true division throughout
    the module.

  • A command line option will enable run-time warnings for classic
    division applied to int or long arguments; another command line
    option will make true division the default.

  • The standard library will use the future division statement and the
    // operator when appropriate, so as to completely avoid classic
    division.

因此,如果您希望当输入为123456789987654321时Python代码正确运行,则需要使用下限除法运算符//:

def answer(n):
    count = 0
    t = int(n)
    while t != 1:
        t = t + 1 if (t % 2==1) else t // 2
        count += 1
    return count

标签:long-integer,biginteger,python,java
来源: https://codeday.me/bug/20191109/2012857.html

本站声明: 1. iCode9 技术分享网(下文简称本站)提供的所有内容,仅供技术学习、探讨和分享;
2. 关于本站的所有留言、评论、转载及引用,纯属内容发起人的个人观点,与本站观点和立场无关;
3. 关于本站的所有言论和文字,纯属内容发起人的个人观点,与本站观点和立场无关;
4. 本站文章均是网友提供,不完全保证技术分享内容的完整性、准确性、时效性、风险性和版权归属;如您发现该文章侵犯了您的权益,可联系我们第一时间进行删除;
5. 本站为非盈利性的个人网站,所有内容不会用来进行牟利,也不会利用任何形式的广告来间接获益,纯粹是为了广大技术爱好者提供技术内容和技术思想的分享性交流网站。

专注分享技术,共同学习,共同进步。侵权联系[81616952@qq.com]

Copyright (C)ICode9.com, All Rights Reserved.

ICode9版权所有