ICode9

精准搜索请尝试: 精确搜索
首页 > 编程语言> 文章详细

java并发:CAS、Unsafe

2021-08-10 09:02:41  阅读:231  来源: 互联网

标签:code java CAS public Unsafe class int final


CAS

CAS即CompareandSwap,其具体的意思是比较并交换。

它是JDK提供的非阻塞原子性操作,它通过硬件保证了“比较、更新”操作的原子性。

 

Unsafe

JDK 里的 Unsafe 类提供了一系列的 compareAndSwap*方法,代码文件路径如下: 

其定义了如下几个 compareAndSwap*方法:

剖析compareAndSwapInt

相关代码定义如下:

    /**
     * Atomically updates Java variable to {@code x} if it is currently
     * holding {@code expected}.
     *
     * <p>This operation has memory semantics of a {@code volatile} read
     * and write.  Corresponds to C11 atomic_compare_exchange_strong.
     *
     * @return {@code true} if successful
     */
    @ForceInline
    public final boolean compareAndSwapInt(Object o, long offset,
                                           int expected,
                                           int x) {
        return theInternalUnsafe.compareAndSetInt(o, offset, expected, x);
    }

从上述代码可以看到CAS有四个操作数,分别是:对象内存位置、对象中的变量的偏移量、变量预期值和新值。

具体含义:

如果对象 obj 中内存偏移量为 valueOffset的变量的值为 expect,则使用新值 update替换旧值 expect;这是处理器提供的一个原子性指令。

Note:

从上述方法的定义可以发现其实际上是调用了变量 theInternalUnsafe 的 compareAndSetInt 方法,该变量在类中的定义如下:

/**
 * A collection of methods for performing low-level, unsafe operations.
 * Although the class and all methods are public, use of this class is
 * limited because only trusted code can obtain instances of it.
 *
 * <em>Note:</em> It is the resposibility of the caller to make sure
 * arguments are checked before methods of this class are
 * called. While some rudimentary checks are performed on the input,
 * the checks are best effort and when performance is an overriding
 * priority, as when methods of this class are optimized by the
 * runtime compiler, some or all checks (if any) may be elided. Hence,
 * the caller must not rely on the checks and corresponding
 * exceptions!
 *
 * @author John R. Rose
 * @see #getUnsafe
 */

public final class Unsafe {

    static {
        Reflection.registerMethodsToFilter(Unsafe.class, "getUnsafe");
    }

    private Unsafe() {}

    private static final Unsafe theUnsafe = new Unsafe();
    private static final jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe theInternalUnsafe = jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.getUnsafe();

    /**
     * Provides the caller with the capability of performing unsafe
     * operations.
     *
     * <p>The returned {@code Unsafe} object should be carefully guarded
     * by the caller, since it can be used to read and write data at arbitrary
     * memory addresses.  It must never be passed to untrusted code.
     *
     * <p>Most methods in this class are very low-level, and correspond to a
     * small number of hardware instructions (on typical machines).  Compilers
     * are encouraged to optimize these methods accordingly.
     *
     * <p>Here is a suggested idiom for using unsafe operations:
     *
     * <pre> {@code
     * class MyTrustedClass {
     *   private static final Unsafe unsafe = Unsafe.getUnsafe();
     *   ...
     *   private long myCountAddress = ...;
     *   public int getCount() { return unsafe.getByte(myCountAddress); }
     * }}</pre>
     *
     * (It may assist compilers to make the local variable {@code final}.)
     *
     * @throws  SecurityException if the class loader of the caller
     *          class is not in the system domain in which all permissions
     *          are granted.
     */
    @CallerSensitive
    public static Unsafe getUnsafe() {
        Class<?> caller = Reflection.getCallerClass();
        if (!VM.isSystemDomainLoader(caller.getClassLoader()))
            throw new SecurityException("Unsafe");
        return theUnsafe;
    }

关于 theInternalUnsafe 将在后面详细讲述。

ABA 问题

关于CAS操作有个经典的ABA问题,具体案例如下:

线程I在获取变量X的值(变量X的初始值是A)后使用CAS操作将其修改为 B,假设操作成功,则程序运行一定是正确的吗?

其实未必,在线程I获取变量 X 的值后,在执行 CAS 前,线程II使用 CAS 修改变量X的值为B,随后又使用CAS修改变量X的值为A;则该场景中线程I在执行CAS时X的值虽然是A,但这个A己经不是线程I获取的A了。

 

ABA 问题的产生是因为变量的状态值产生了环形转换,即变量的值从 A 到 B, 然后再从 B 到 A。

如果变量的值只能朝着一个方向转换,比如 A 到 B,B 到 C,不构成环形,则不会存在问题。

JDK 中的 AtomicStampedReference 类给每个变量的状态值都配备了一个时间戳,从而避免了ABA问题的产生。

 

theInternalUnsafe

前述 compareAndSwapInt 方法中使用的 theInternalUnsafe 也是Unsafe类的实例,由此可知JDK里还存在另一个 Unsafe 类,代码文件路径如下:

 

这两个Unsafe类对应的包名如下图所示

 

由JDK11中AtomicInteger的定义,知其使用的是jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe。

(JDK8中使用的是sun.misc.Unsafe,地址

AtomicInteger的代码片段如下:

/**
 * An {@code int} value that may be updated atomically.  See the
 * {@link VarHandle} specification for descriptions of the properties
 * of atomic accesses. An {@code AtomicInteger} is used in
 * applications such as atomically incremented counters, and cannot be
 * used as a replacement for an {@link java.lang.Integer}. However,
 * this class does extend {@code Number} to allow uniform access by
 * tools and utilities that deal with numerically-based classes.
 *
 * @since 1.5
 * @author Doug Lea
 */
public class AtomicInteger extends Number implements java.io.Serializable {
    private static final long serialVersionUID = 6214790243416807050L;

    /*
     * This class intended to be implemented using VarHandles, but there
     * are unresolved cyclic startup dependencies.
     */
    private static final jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe U = jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.getUnsafe();
    private static final long VALUE = U.objectFieldOffset(AtomicInteger.class, "value");

    private volatile int value;

    /**
     * Creates a new AtomicInteger with the given initial value.
     *
     * @param initialValue the initial value
     */
    public AtomicInteger(int initialValue) {
        value = initialValue;
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new AtomicInteger with initial value {@code 0}.
     */
    public AtomicInteger() {
    }

 

jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe对应的代码片段如下:

/**
 * A collection of methods for performing low-level, unsafe operations.
 * Although the class and all methods are public, use of this class is
 * limited because only trusted code can obtain instances of it.
 *
 * <em>Note:</em> It is the resposibility of the caller to make sure
 * arguments are checked before methods of this class are
 * called. While some rudimentary checks are performed on the input,
 * the checks are best effort and when performance is an overriding
 * priority, as when methods of this class are optimized by the
 * runtime compiler, some or all checks (if any) may be elided. Hence,
 * the caller must not rely on the checks and corresponding
 * exceptions!
 *
 * @author John R. Rose
 * @see #getUnsafe
 */

public final class Unsafe {

    private static native void registerNatives();
    static {
        registerNatives();
    }

    private Unsafe() {}

    private static final Unsafe theUnsafe = new Unsafe();

    /**
     * Provides the caller with the capability of performing unsafe
     * operations.
     *
     * <p>The returned {@code Unsafe} object should be carefully guarded
     * by the caller, since it can be used to read and write data at arbitrary
     * memory addresses.  It must never be passed to untrusted code.
     *
     * <p>Most methods in this class are very low-level, and correspond to a
     * small number of hardware instructions (on typical machines).  Compilers
     * are encouraged to optimize these methods accordingly.
     *
     * <p>Here is a suggested idiom for using unsafe operations:
     *
     * <pre> {@code
     * class MyTrustedClass {
     *   private static final Unsafe unsafe = Unsafe.getUnsafe();
     *   ...
     *   private long myCountAddress = ...;
     *   public int getCount() { return unsafe.getByte(myCountAddress); }
     * }}</pre>
     *
     * (It may assist compilers to make the local variable {@code final}.)
     */
    public static Unsafe getUnsafe() {
        return theUnsafe;
    }

 

该类中有很多CompareAndSetXXX方法

 

剖析compareAndSetInt

    /**
     * Atomically updates Java variable to {@code x} if it is currently
     * holding {@code expected}.
     *
     * <p>This operation has memory semantics of a {@code volatile} read
     * and write.  Corresponds to C11 atomic_compare_exchange_strong.
     *
     * @return {@code true} if successful
     */
    @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
    public final native boolean compareAndSetInt(Object o, long offset,
                                                 int expected,
                                                 int x);

    @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
    public final native int compareAndExchangeInt(Object o, long offset,
                                                  int expected,
                                                  int x);

    @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
    public final int compareAndExchangeIntAcquire(Object o, long offset,
                                                         int expected,
                                                         int x) {
        return compareAndExchangeInt(o, offset, expected, x);
    }

    @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
    public final int compareAndExchangeIntRelease(Object o, long offset,
                                                         int expected,
                                                         int x) {
        return compareAndExchangeInt(o, offset, expected, x);
    }

    @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
    public final boolean weakCompareAndSetIntPlain(Object o, long offset,
                                                   int expected,
                                                   int x) {
        return compareAndSetInt(o, offset, expected, x);
    }

    @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
    public final boolean weakCompareAndSetIntAcquire(Object o, long offset,
                                                     int expected,
                                                     int x) {
        return compareAndSetInt(o, offset, expected, x);
    }

    @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
    public final boolean weakCompareAndSetIntRelease(Object o, long offset,
                                                     int expected,
                                                     int x) {
        return compareAndSetInt(o, offset, expected, x);
    }

    @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
    public final boolean weakCompareAndSetInt(Object o, long offset,
                                              int expected,
                                              int x) {
        return compareAndSetInt(o, offset, expected, x);
    }

从上述代码可以看到该Unsafe类中的compareAndSetInt 和 compareAndExchangeInt方法都是 native方法,它们使用 JNI 的方式访问本地C++实现库。

 

参考资料:

https://howtodoinjava.com/java/multi-threading/compare-and-swap-cas-algorithm/

标签:code,java,CAS,public,Unsafe,class,int,final
来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/studyLog-share/p/15120573.html

本站声明: 1. iCode9 技术分享网(下文简称本站)提供的所有内容,仅供技术学习、探讨和分享;
2. 关于本站的所有留言、评论、转载及引用,纯属内容发起人的个人观点,与本站观点和立场无关;
3. 关于本站的所有言论和文字,纯属内容发起人的个人观点,与本站观点和立场无关;
4. 本站文章均是网友提供,不完全保证技术分享内容的完整性、准确性、时效性、风险性和版权归属;如您发现该文章侵犯了您的权益,可联系我们第一时间进行删除;
5. 本站为非盈利性的个人网站,所有内容不会用来进行牟利,也不会利用任何形式的广告来间接获益,纯粹是为了广大技术爱好者提供技术内容和技术思想的分享性交流网站。

专注分享技术,共同学习,共同进步。侵权联系[81616952@qq.com]

Copyright (C)ICode9.com, All Rights Reserved.

ICode9版权所有